In
Feb. 2012 I reported back to WAPDA. Mr. Muhammad Ali Shah, the then GM
(C&M) Water who knew me very well offered three options for new posting to
choose any one from; Central Contract Cell (CCC), Planning & Investigation
Org. and GM (Central) office. I opted for the former and he advised me to visit
him after a week to collect posting orders. When I went to collect the same
after a week he cut a sorry face and said: Somehow we can’t place you in CCC,
therefore, you must give us alternate option. I opted for P&I Org.
Nevertheless, my inquisition in the matter revealed to me that postings in CCC
were subject to clearance from someone influential with Authority. Since I
didn’t take the “prescribed and well defined route” therefore my posting was
stalled in CCC. Without lamenting it, I resumed my services in P&I Org. in
the following week. Few months later I was promoted as Director (Civil) and
retained with P&I Org. on the recommendations of Mr. Ashraf Abid, the then Chief
Engineer (P&I). Mr. Abid had been my senior colleague when we started our
service with WAPDA at Kalabagh Dam Project in 1984.
On
joining P&I Org., I knew that one of our batch mates Mr. Bilal Karimi was working
there but had never met him before. I visited his office and introduced myself.
He was immediately on his feet and smilingly said: So, you are Mr. Pitafi, I
heard a lot about you. I enquired: What did you know about me? He smiled again
and said: I always ask my Sindhi friends that they don’t take their respective
work seriously? In response they would say: Have you met Mr. Pitafi? Had you
met him you would not have passed such a comment.
Working
in P&I Org. was altogether a new experience. Planning and design of new water
storage dams and hydropower projects was an interesting field. I was assigned
to supervise consultancy services of design of Mohmand Dam Hydropower Project
in addition to some other assignments. In July 2016 I was promoted as Chief
Engineer and kept working there till Jan. 2018. In view of my (and my team
along with consultants) excessive efforts in the preparation of bidding
documents and initiation of the process of award of consultancy contract and
award of work for construction of Mohmand Dam Project it was widely believed in
WAPDA that I would be posted as GM/PD of this project. Besides, I was also
tipped by most senior officers for becoming GM of Mohmand Dam Project. However,
the competent authority had an entirely different idea and arrangement in
his/their mind. Eventually I was promoted as General Manager and posted as GM
Projects/Project Director, Northern Areas in Jan. 2018.
Only
after assuming the charge of the position of GM (Projects) Northern Areas did I
come to realization that how problematic this position was! All six contracts
of 3-High Head Projects (two each of Allai, Duber and Khan Khwar respectively)
needed to be closed down. Similarly, 3-High Head Consultancy Services contract
was still intact whereas all hydropower plants were in operation since 2014. In
addition, all contracts of Satpara Dam Project were also in dire need of
closing. The civil contract of Keyal Khwar HPP was terminated in Dec. 2017 due
to poor performance of the contractor and it required to be retendered again.
Perhaps this was not enough when I further learnt that more than 200 Audit
Paras (PDPs and DPs) needed to be defended at DAC and PAC level for settlement.
Next
two and half years were not a smooth sailing at all, however, with the
cooperation and efforts of my junior colleagues in the office we were able to conclude
all six contracts of 3-High Head HPPs and 3-High Head Consultancy services contract
with the approval of WAPDA Authority. Non-approval of 3rd Revised
PC-I of Satpara Dam Project incl. Shatung Nullah Diversion thereby non-availability
of PSDP funds is the major hurdle in conclusion of Satpara contracts.
The most frustrating part of GMship is
attending Departmental Accounts Committee (DAC) and to some extent Public
Accounts Committee (PAC) meetings. In DAC meetings, the concerned GM/PD is
treated as an “Accused” before some 20 judges to explain the justification of
“Wrong Doing” by the incumbent or his predecessors, mostly it’s about
predecessors’. In spite of providing all relevant details, explanations,
proofs, DAC never agrees on settling the Proposed Draft Para (PDP) and digs out
new queries and questions for furnishing revised reply and justification. In
rare cases when DAC can’t find any more reasons to keep it pending PDPs are
either put under ‘Verification mode” or changed into DPs and referred to PAC
for decision when DAC has the power to settle PDPs at its own level.
Till
2018 the Draft Paras used to be defended in PAC by the respective Principal
Accounting Officer (PAO) duly supported by WAPDA Authority. Now, concerned GMs
are thrown into the arena for defending the DPs before the coveted forum. (Next...Part 4/4)